You are using an outdated browser. For a faster, safer browsing experience, upgrade for free today.
Phones: 800
$ USD
  • Your shopping cart is empty!

300Mm F2 8 For Nikon

Related products

Chimera F2 Baffle - 10x30' Size

$2,218.92 $3,417.14

Xf 90mm F2 R Lm Wr

$2,187.00 $3,411.72

Zeiss Milvus F2/100 Lens Inlay

$117.00 $162.63

Zeiss Inlay Milvus F2/50 Lens

$117.00 $177.84

Nikon Af-s Nikkor 300mm F/4e Lens

$5,990.85 $8,147.56

Nikon Af Zoom-nikkor 70-300mm Lens

$509.85 $718.89

Nikon Af-s Dx 18-300mm F/3.5-6.3g Lens

$2,090.85 $3,178.09

Nikon Af-s Dx 18-300mm Vr Lens

$2,090.85 $2,613.56

Related review

Shaun 2024-05-03 01:22:37

[0.155 lb] This fits my Nikon D3400 with 18mm-300mm lens attached perfectly

5
anyonymous 0000-00-00 00:00:00

[62 mm to 82 mm] Perfect for my collection of 67mm working on my 75-300mm Nikon - buying used makes so much sense

5
Robert 2024-04-26 07:55:10

[Camouflage] I was very nervous to spring for this lens already having Nikon's 300mm F2.8 prime in my wagon (yes... the 300 is heavy). But wow, beautiful sharpness, hand held is a delight. No need to repeat the many positive reviews here. If you're sticking with DLSR bodies, this is a wonderful lens.

5
Shaun 2024-06-03 08:52:50

This fits my Nikon D3400 with 18mm-300mm lens attached perfectly

5
desorbophoto 2024-06-06 05:23:50

[Neoprene] I've used the raincoat 3 times since my purchase, on a Nikon 300mm lens and on a Tamron 150-600 lens. Easy on/off..stays on.. yes the fabric bunches up a bit on the Tamron zooming in and out, but nothing that couldn't be handled. I would buy this and other Lenscoat Raincoats and and will recommend them to my peers.

5
Thomas W. 2024-07-06 02:17:51

[Plastic] Since the used Nikon 55-300mm lens did not come with a lens hood, I purchased this one identical to Nikon hood but cheaper.

5
Bialik German 2024-04-02 06:48:33

[Yes] My Nikon Z7II with my 40mm f2 fits very well and there is a little insufficient space for other lenses but it can be useful for some other accessory. I suppose it will also work with larger lenses like the 50 with Z mount. But with an adapter and any other lens the space is insufficient. The quality is good and it is perfect for what I needed, which is to take the camera with me for walks around the city. If I have to carry more objectives, I prefer the backpack.

5
Craig 2024-05-01 09:33:10

[APS-C] Back in the 1970's me and my Nikon F2 had a Nikkor reflex. They were an odd duck to use but fun. With the new 400 and 500 f8 reflex lenses by Tokina, and my getting back into film, it made sense to grab one of these inexpensive telephoto's to hook up to my refurbished Nikon F2p. They are lightweight, with manual focus, and an f-stop that requires some fast film. With modern post processing, the loss of contrast is easily fixed. Unusual doughnut shaped Bokeh can be used to your advantage but some folks find the out of focus areas messy. It works very well for night time shots when mounted to an astronomical guided tripod.

5
Moses 2024-04-24 08:59:21

[Sony E] Works like advertised. I use it with the Nikon Nikkor AI 35mm F2 (Nikon F Mount Ai) for a Sony a6500; fits tight, focus ♾. Great buy.

5
Christopher 2024-06-21 08:16:31

[8] I shoot film for two reasons: 1. Film lets me shoot with old cameras. (My favorites right now are the Nikon F2 and Nikon S2. I also shoot a Nikon FE which I like very much.) Older cameras don't necessarily take "better" pictures, but I think I take better pictures with them. I have to slow down and be more deliberate. This doesn't mean I can't shoot something that is happening at high-tempo, but I just have to plan better. 2. Film renders images differently than one of my digital cameras. Colors, contrasts, dynamic range -- all different. Not necessarily "better," but different. Better is a matter of opinion based on whatever criteria you establish. Sometimes "better" is not technically superior; it just looks really nice. So, this review is following my first roll of Lomo100. I was shooting my F2 with a 50mm f/2. Lomo100 has a nice clean look about it. Contrast is pretty good in strong outdoor light where you'll probably be using 100 speed film anyway. Colors are not super-saturated, but nice. It renders color somewhere between Portra and Ektar. It's a tad bit grainy for a 100 speed film -- but see note 2 above -- NBD. It's inexpensive and fun to shoot. Although I shoot more expensive films on occasion, I have a hard time justifying it in a 35mm camera when you can have a great time with stuff like this, Fuji C200, and Agfa 200 (if you can still find some).

5