You are using an outdated browser. For a faster, safer browsing experience, upgrade for free today.
Phones: 800
$ USD
  • Your shopping cart is empty!

Best Closed Back Headphones 500

Related products

Aviator Headphones Best

$599.70 $833.58

Mackie Mc-350 Closed-back Headphones Green

$314.97 $456.71

Akg K872 Closed-back Over-ear Headphones

$5,457.00 $8,021.79

Akg K371 Closed-back Studio Headphones

$537.00 $687.36

Akg K361 Closed-back Studio Headphones

$357.00 $539.07

Focal Stellia Closed-back Over-ear Headphones

$8,997.00 $13,675.44

Shure Srh1540 Closed-back Studio Headphones

$1,497.00 $1,901.19

Audix A150 Closed-back Studio Headphones

$627.00 $802.56

Cad Mh400 Closed-back Studio Headphones

$149.97 $199.46

Related review

Lyle 2024-07-06 08:59:10

[0.175 lb] This extension cord gives me the range to us my new Rode NTH-100 Professional Closed-Back Over-Ear Headphones from my sofa to the AVR to watch TV. Great quality.

5
Cont4gioN 2024-07-19 04:25:52

[12 A] These are built like tanks and never ever fail. Love them. Best Back-Up power ever.

5
Herbert 2024-04-15 09:18:27

[Closed-Back] Best headphones I've ever owned! Outstanding!

5
Lawrence 0000-00-00 00:00:00

[Memory Foam] I wouldn't pay full retail for these headphones, but at the current sale price, it's a great set of headphones if an open back design will work for you. Keep this in mind - professional studio recording headphones have to be a closed back design, for multiple obvious reasons. It's more difficult to get neutral balanced sound from the drivers with closed backs. So thus you get the whole headphone scene for audio production tasks. You can't use these Philips headphones for any of that, but for normal consumer enjoyment of music, if nobody is bothered by the sound coming out the back of the phones, these sound absolutely fantastic. Beautiful open, clear, three dimensional soundstage that presents any recording at its best.

5
Ken 2024-04-07 02:31:57

[2 Hours] This Philips Fidelio X2HR choice was my first open-backed headphones after always using closed-backed. It was a great choice. The sound is much better than I was used to and the comfort level on the ears and head is also much more comfortable. I am not an audiophile like some of the other reviewers, yet I am very pleased with my choice. I highly recommend these headphones.

5
Rebecca 2024-04-07 04:48:11

[12 Ohms] I purchased these as an upgrade, and have enjoyed them so far. They’re lightweight, and even though they’re closed-back headphones, they’re not hot or tight on my head. The high frequencies stand out a little more than I’m used to, but it didn’t take long to adjust my hearing.

5
Doug B 2024-05-12 03:19:12

[9.8' / 3 m] These are one of the best headphones that I have ever owned. I needed closed can for running our 32 channel church mixer and all my past headphones have been AKG as well. This is top of my list on the phones that I have owned in the past

5
MarkInTheGardens 2024-06-13 07:48:57

[Black] I have been reading about these beauties for some time. I have a home studio with no shortage of high quality headphones for tracking but they are all closed-back style for noise isolation. Many pros insist that open-back headphones are best for mixing because of accuracy, a lack of bass buildup and reduced ear fatigue. Although the HD600s are advertised as "audiophile" phones, I have repeatedly seen them reviewed as being some of the most accurate units around for professional mixing as well. B&H had them on a special and I took the leap. When they arrived, like all new transducers, they were a little stiff and needed some breaking in. After running music�through�them for about two days, they really opened up. Now, I totally agree with the reviews I've seen. These babies are spot-on accurate. There is a slight bass boost which would be distracting if these were closed-back because the energy couldn't dissipate but with the open-back design it's present but not really noticeable. What really shines with these are everything above about 50 Hz which is ruler flat all the way up. I use SonarWorks Reference to fine tune the response and the "averaged" response compensation curve for the HD600s is within 3 dB through the mids and highs - the flattest curve for any phones modeled in the software. OK, now my ONLY gripe is that they have separate wiring to each earcup rather than the more conventional single sided cable input but that's a minor thing compared to the amazing sound. If you're serious about mixing and need accurate headphones, these are the ones.

5
AlleghenyTom 2024-07-07 02:53:57

[32 Ohms] The Roland RH-5 headphones are inexpensive quality headphones that are great sounding, closed, over the ear, lite weight and comfortable. The price is low enough that several won't brake your bank account. The cord is a heavy duty cord that should take quite a bit of stress. They work nicely as phones for recording sessions with multiple muscians.

5
Matt 2024-07-22 04:29:47

[Black] I debated between these, and the AT-50s that seem to be it's closed back competition. I do not have a lot of extensive use with headphones, never much cared for them. But new living space calls for quiet listening at night, so, headphones. The only other pair I've used a lot are an old pair of Pioneer closed-back cans. Frankly, I do not like the style, too confining, creates pressure in my head, etc. These have none of that. Very open, comfortable (very good for large heads, but maybe bad for small ones), and no real fatigue. There is some, again, not a regular user until now (46) so that probably factors in just getting used to them. But sound wise, I'm really impressed. Hearing so much new detail I've picked up on before in many records. Clear, excellent bass, detailed mids, pretty-clean highs (could be smoother, but I also think headphones in general have harsher treble), but I'm kind of nitpicking there. Excellent, well-built cans.

5