Canon 16 To 35Mm Lens

[82 mm] Lens has little breathing, less vignetting than the Canon 16-35mm, and is pretty sharp. The price is a no brainer. Love that that it works on FF and even RED Raptor and you can switch to PL

[Aluminum] I had absolutely no issues when using this with my Canon EF 16-35mm f/4L IS USM Lens, including the lack of vignetting, which was suggested to be a problem given the wide field of view with these shorter lenses.

[0.2 lb] Great step down ring. Just what I needed for my Canon 16-35mm lens. Very sturdy build.

[Canon EF] I'm a serious amateur photographer. I use this lens with a Canon 5D Mark 2. I already have the Canon 16-35mm but the 14mm is significantly wider angle. I very much enjoy using this lens and it works flawlessly on a full-frame camera. Only thing I don't like about the lens, and I don't know what you can do about the problem considering the shape of the front of the lens is that you can't use conventional filters. Also, it's a very expensive lens. The build quality seems like other L Canon lenses, which is to say excellent. If the price doesn't scare you off, I'd highly recomment this lens to anyone who is addicted to extreme wide angle photography!

[9 x 5.5 x 5.4"] Canon's 16-35mm f/4 L series lens is likely the sharpest wide angle lens that is currently manufactured by Canon. Superb contrast and decent bokeh are also a hallmark of this lens. Landscape and architecture are rendered very well. My previous wide angle lens was the Canon 17-40mm f/4 L. At the current price point of $999 at B&H, I would suggest that anyone in the market for a Canon wide angle lens should give the 16-35mm f/4 L serious consideration.

[Rubber] I got these for my Canon 50mm 1.4, 100mm 2.8 macro, 16-35mm 4l, and my 58mm Helios and they all fit perfectly and nice and tight. They take a little wiggling to get on and then you're good to go. Amazing cheap and effective product. Honestly the best bang for your buck you're going to get out of Tilta, maybe besides the Nano Nucleus.

[Aluminum] I use the ring with a lee foundation kit on my canon 16-35mm f2.8. Works perfectly with no vignette... Just what I was looking for!

[f/16] The lens is far sharper than the 16-35mm zoom lens I've been using on my DSLR. I highly recommend it.

[Light Pollution] If you're serious about taking real estate photos, this lens is the perfect choice. I've used the 16-35mm 2.8 canon lens for real estate photo for over 5 years. The 11-24mm give me more flexibility for interior shots that I couldn't achieve with the 16-35mm. This lens is heavy but ounce for ounce out performs the 16-35mm. Corner to corner it's sharp without any noticeable chromatic aberrations or distortions. I highly recommend this for serious photographers who can handle the price for this lens.

[1x USB-C Input] Simply put the Lumix 16-35mm is an outstanding lens! I currently own Leica’s M 21mm SEM which is a gem. I’ve also owned the Leica SL 16-35mm which I eventually sold as I found it to be too big and heavy.  I also found that Leica’s SL 16-35 image quality doesn’t quite live up to all the hype, particularly when one factors in its exorbitant cost. The Lumix handily holds its own in the above mentioned company. It’s well built and yet it’s light with excellent handling. It balances beautifully on an Leica SL2. The image quality, colours and corner to corner resolution are all excellent. If one is looking for a wide angle lens that strikes the optimum balance between performance, cost and ease of use, the Lumix 16-35mm F4 L mount is in a class by itself.