You are using an outdated browser. For a faster, safer browsing experience, upgrade for free today.
Phones: 800
$ USD
  • Your shopping cart is empty!

Canon Ef 35Mm F/2 Is Usm Lens

Related products

Canon Ef 35mm F/2 Is Usm Lens For Photography

$1,797.00 $2,569.71

Canon Ef 16-35mm F/4l Is Usm Lens Review

$3,897.00 $5,260.95

Canon Ef 35mm F/1.4l Ii Usm Lens For Photography

$5,397.00 $7,717.71

Canon Ef 50mm F/1.4 Usm Lens For Photography

$1,047.00 $1,434.39

Canon Ef 50mm F/1.4 Usm Lens Review

$1,197.00 $1,891.26

Canon Ef 135mm F/2l Usm Lens For Sale

$2,997.00 $4,735.26

Canon Ef 85mm F/1.4l Is Usm Lens For Photography

$4,197.00 $5,582.01

Canon Ef 17-40mm F/4l Usm Lens For Sale

$1,797.00 $2,803.32

Canon Ef 17-40mm F/4l Usm Lens For Dslr

$1,797.00 $2,533.77

Canon Ef 11-24mm F/4l Usm Lens Review

$7,497.00 $9,521.19

Canon Ef-s 17-55mm F/2.8 Is Usm Lens

$2,097.00 $2,642.22

Canon Ef 17-40mm F/4l Usm Lens For Photography

$1,797.00 $2,461.89

Canon Ef 16-35mm F/2.8l Iii Usm Lens

$5,997.00 $9,415.29

Canon Ef 16-35mm F/2.8l Iii Usm Refurbished Lens

$4,497.00 $7,015.32

Canon Rf 14-35mm F/4 L Is Usm Lens

$4,197.00 $5,078.37

Canon Ef 35mm Lens

$318.00 $496.08

Rokinon 35mm F/1.2 Lens For Canon Ef-m Black

$1,197.00 $1,831.41

Opteka 35mm F/1.7 Lens Canon Ef-m

$296.97 $377.15

7artisans 35mm F/0.95 Lens For Canon Ef-m

$747.00 $1,038.33

Ttartisan 35mm F/1.4 Lens Canon Ef-m Black

$219.00 $278.13

Related review

Dylan 2024-04-13 04:18:13

[Aluminum] I had absolutely no issues when using this with my Canon EF 16-35mm f/4L IS USM Lens, including the lack of vignetting, which was suggested to be a problem given the wide field of view with these shorter lenses.

5
William 2024-09-09 09:48:44

[Empty] A perfect fit for my new Canon EF-S 17-55mm f/2.8 IS USM Lens!

5
Gary 0000-00-00 00:00:00

[Bayonet] This lens hood is a perfect fit for my Canon EF 70-300 IS USM Lens. I usually buy only Canon accessories but thought I'd try the Vello this time, and I couldn't be more pleased. The fit is snug so there's no wobble or looseness, and the finish is flawless. I definitely recommend this hood and I'll certainly try other Vello products in the future. Then only downside to my purchase is the S L O W order processing and delivery that is characteristic of B&H Photo :(

5
anyonymous 2024-04-05 01:41:17

[Zoom Gear] The lens has been bought to use with Canon EOS 40d.My choice was between: - Canon EF-S 17-55 f/2.8 IS USM - Canon EF 24-105mm f/4L IS USM - Canon EF 24-70 f/2.8L USMI choose Canon EF 24-70 f/2.8L USM, mostly because this lens has the best picture for me.If I am a reporter, I would choose EF 24-105 f/4L for the wider focus range and IS.If my god is sharpness and I really have a need of a wider angle everyday, I would take EF-S 17-55 f/2.8 (but no L construction and no possibility to use on the full frame), BTW many people stating that this is the best everyday choice for Canons with APS-C size image sensors, I see deep reasons for these statements.These too lenses are really nice and additionally both have IS, but the picture you receive from them is not so artistic comparing to EF 24-70 f/2.8L, this made my choice.Canon EF 24-70 f/2.8L USM strong sides: - nice picture; - high sharpness; - universal zoom range, including range for portraits; - really fast focus; - strong L construction; - the lens hood sold with this lens (it's huge, but really works, it's one of the best).Weaknesses: - no IS (if it matters for you in this focus range); - big and heavy.--....The lens is perfect, has no back or front focus and works with my Canon EOS 40d flawless.

5
Hiroko 2024-05-27 07:17:23

[1/2" Bayonet] I was waiting for Canon Extender EF 2X III for a long while. I am very happy with it to extend the zoom to 400 mm on my Canon EF 70-200mm f/2.8L IS III USM lens which is the best lens I have. Lately I have been photographing Hawks, Hummingbirds and etc and find this Canon Extender EF 2X III gives me the ability to photograph at 400mm without purchasing another Canon lenses. With this Extender EF 2X III, the maximum aperture is smaller by 2 stops (f/5.6 for my lens). With Canon EOS 5D Mark III body, Canon EF 70-200mm f/2.8L IS III USM Lens and Canon Extender EF 2X III, it weights about 6.4 pounds which is a little heavy but manageable. Overall, I am glad I purchased this 2X Extender.

5
MT Dave 2024-06-02 07:40:29

[Full-Frame] Although I have not used this particular lens at length yet, it compliments my Canon EF 400 f2.8 IS USM II very nicely. Weight difference is significant between the two allowing hand held shots to be easily captured.

5
anyonymous 2024-07-12 07:33:21

[Bayonet] Bought this for my EF-S 10-22mm f/3.5-4.5 USM Lens. I believe Canon should include the hood with the lens, but that's just my opinion.

5
P J N 2024-06-17 06:53:51

[Yes] Prior to my EOS-1D X Mark II, I was using an EOS 6D Mark II with EF 35mm f/1.4L II USM and EF 70-200mm f/2.8L IS II USM. I've been shooting primarily nature, animals, and outdoor sports -- bouldering and rope climbing -- with occasional portraits and group shots. Due to a challenging combination of low light and fast movement, I used to have many missed shots. That wasn't a problem since I take 5000 or so separate exposures per session. Now with the EOS-1D X Mark II, nearly every shot is flawless -- sharp and well-exposed -- and the only challenge is selecting the best of the best. I actually had to buy a new computer to handle the load of RAW processing. I couldn't be happier.

5
Richard 2024-05-02 06:28:45

[58 mm (Front)] Youd think for the price this would have some flaws. At f.1/4 its pretty sharp at f.2 its razor sharp. I did not look at the outer edges of the frames as Im concerned with my subject. Good buy for the price.

5
William 2024-06-24 05:16:58

[0.115 lb] This is a great substitute to the much more expensive OEM version lens hood for the Canon EF-35mm 2.0 IS. It fit snuggly onto the lens and the only difference between this and the OEM hood is the felt on the OEM hood.

5