You are using an outdated browser. For a faster, safer browsing experience, upgrade for free today.
Phones: 800
$ USD
  • Your shopping cart is empty!

Canon Lens 70 300 Is Usm

Related products

Canon Rf 70-200mm F/2.8 L Is Usm Lens

$7,497.00 $9,896.04

Canon Ef 70-200mm F/4l Is Ii Usm Lens Review

$3,897.00 $5,183.01

Canon Ef 50mm F/1.4 Usm Lens For Photography

$1,047.00 $1,434.39

Canon Ef 50mm F/1.4 Usm Lens Review

$1,197.00 $1,891.26

Canon Ef 135mm F/2l Usm Lens For Sale

$2,997.00 $4,735.26

Canon Ef 85mm F/1.4l Is Usm Lens For Photography

$4,197.00 $5,582.01

Canon Ef 35mm F/2 Is Usm Lens For Photography

$1,797.00 $2,569.71

Canon Rf 24-105mm F/4 L Is Usm Lens

$3,597.00 $5,107.74

Canon Rf 85mm F/1.2 L Usm Lens

$7,497.00 $9,221.31

Canon Rf 14-35mm F/4 L Is Usm Lens

$4,197.00 $5,078.37

Canon Ef 70-200mm F/2.8l Is Iii Usm Lens

$5,547.00 $8,320.50

Canon Ef 70-200mm F/4l Is Ii Usm Lens

$4,497.00 $6,925.38

Canon Ef 17-40mm F/4l Usm Lens For Sale

$1,797.00 $2,803.32

Related review

Gary 0000-00-00 00:00:00

[Bayonet] This lens hood is a perfect fit for my Canon EF 70-300 IS USM Lens. I usually buy only Canon accessories but thought I'd try the Vello this time, and I couldn't be more pleased. The fit is snug so there's no wobble or looseness, and the finish is flawless. I definitely recommend this hood and I'll certainly try other Vello products in the future. Then only downside to my purchase is the S L O W order processing and delivery that is characteristic of B&H Photo :(

5
Jazzman247 0000-00-00 00:00:00

[0.2 lb] Use this with my Canon 70-300 lens. Love it. Protects well so far.

5
GA 2024-04-29 04:57:18

[Canon EF-S] This lens is great. I had a Canon 70-300 but this is so much faster and the images are better also.

5
anyonymous 2024-04-05 01:41:17

[Zoom Gear] The lens has been bought to use with Canon EOS 40d.My choice was between: - Canon EF-S 17-55 f/2.8 IS USM - Canon EF 24-105mm f/4L IS USM - Canon EF 24-70 f/2.8L USMI choose Canon EF 24-70 f/2.8L USM, mostly because this lens has the best picture for me.If I am a reporter, I would choose EF 24-105 f/4L for the wider focus range and IS.If my god is sharpness and I really have a need of a wider angle everyday, I would take EF-S 17-55 f/2.8 (but no L construction and no possibility to use on the full frame), BTW many people stating that this is the best everyday choice for Canons with APS-C size image sensors, I see deep reasons for these statements.These too lenses are really nice and additionally both have IS, but the picture you receive from them is not so artistic comparing to EF 24-70 f/2.8L, this made my choice.Canon EF 24-70 f/2.8L USM strong sides: - nice picture; - high sharpness; - universal zoom range, including range for portraits; - really fast focus; - strong L construction; - the lens hood sold with this lens (it's huge, but really works, it's one of the best).Weaknesses: - no IS (if it matters for you in this focus range); - big and heavy.--....The lens is perfect, has no back or front focus and works with my Canon EOS 40d flawless.

5
Hiroko 2024-05-27 07:17:23

[1/2" Bayonet] I was waiting for Canon Extender EF 2X III for a long while. I am very happy with it to extend the zoom to 400 mm on my Canon EF 70-200mm f/2.8L IS III USM lens which is the best lens I have. Lately I have been photographing Hawks, Hummingbirds and etc and find this Canon Extender EF 2X III gives me the ability to photograph at 400mm without purchasing another Canon lenses. With this Extender EF 2X III, the maximum aperture is smaller by 2 stops (f/5.6 for my lens). With Canon EOS 5D Mark III body, Canon EF 70-200mm f/2.8L IS III USM Lens and Canon Extender EF 2X III, it weights about 6.4 pounds which is a little heavy but manageable. Overall, I am glad I purchased this 2X Extender.

5
john 2024-05-22 02:49:50

[62mm] ordered with my 70-300 lens

5
Patricia 2024-04-02 09:46:18

[Camouflage] My Canon 70-300 lens with a hood fits perfectly into this pouch. Very good quality for the price.

5
Lynn 2024-06-07 09:46:52

[0.64 lb] It works very well for both my Canon lenses --a macro lens. and a 70-300 mm zoom lens--to attach to a Sony alpha 7s camera. Good clear pictures!

5
anyonymous 2024-05-21 04:38:39

[Multi Coated] Fantastic lens. I love my EF 70-300mm f/4.5-5.6L IS USM, but this fixed lens is so much crisper and better in every way at a fixed 300mm. Even with a 2x extender it's super crisp compared to my old lens.

5
USA ROSE 2024-07-05 07:57:15

[0.085 lb] I am dismayed that someone didn't tell me years ago about this lens years ago. I have some great glass like 70-200 f/2.8, USM, EF 50mm f/1.4 USM, EF 100mm macro f/2.8 USM and my bodies are 7D MKII and 7D. I kept on seeing Pro's using this lens and wondered why...well I see why now that I own one - and in 1 minute flat this has become my go to lens. I usually carry everything with me in a LowePro AW500 bag and unless I am on a photo shoot/job I take it all - But now i only take my 7D MKII and my 24-70 f/2.8 II USM. My pictures are pin sharp - now I am asking why can't Canon make all their lenses this good - REALLY. I agree this is my most expensive lens but if I had to start it all again I would only have 2 lenses 24-70 and 70-200 and i would get 2 of 7D MKII body's with battery pack grips and my Speedlite 580 flash with extra battery pack(i went cheap and got the exact rip off for $30). Bottom line - JUST GET IT - you save money in the long run and take pro pictures. This is free advice from me to you.

5