You are using an outdated browser. For a faster, safer browsing experience, upgrade for free today.
Phones: 800
$ USD
  • Your shopping cart is empty!

Canon Rf 50Mm F 1.2 L Usm

Related products

Canon Rf 85mm F/1.2 L Usm Lens

$7,497.00 $9,221.31

Canon Rf 85mm F/1.2 L Usm Ds Lens

$8,697.00 $12,958.53

Ttartisan 50mm F/1.2 Lens Canon Rf Black

$294.00 $420.42

Canon Rf 24-105mm F/4 L Is Usm Lens

$3,597.00 $5,107.74

Canon Rf 14-35mm F/4 L Is Usm Lens

$4,197.00 $5,078.37

Canon Rf 70-200mm F/2.8 L Is Usm Lens

$7,497.00 $9,896.04

Canon Ef 50mm F/1.4 Usm Lens For Photography

$1,047.00 $1,434.39

Canon Ef 50mm F/1.4 Usm Lens Review

$1,197.00 $1,891.26

Rokinon Sp 50mm F/1.2 Lens Canon Ef

$2,097.00 $3,229.38

Related review

Elena 2024-06-19 06:38:34

[Full-Frame] I'm thrilled with the Canon RF 85mm f/1.2 L USM DS Lens. It's an incredible tool for portrait photography, offering unmatched image quality and beautiful bokeh. Despite its cost and weight, it has significantly enhanced my ability to capture stunning, professional-quality portraits. You can see the results on my Instagram account @nycitypixels.

5
Richard 2024-05-25 09:57:11

[Neoprene] I had the Sigma 50mm EF lens so the first RF lens I purchased was the 28-70 2.0 RF zoom. That zoom was so good I didn't feel I needed the RF 50mm. The second lens I purchased was the 85mm 1.2 RF which is a beast of a lens. There were a few purchases along the way and I finally decided to go ahead and get the 50mm 1.2 RF. WOW, this is the one that says on my camera unless I need one of the other specialties. It's funny how some think it's a large lens but isn't for me as I lived with the two other beasts and this is a light weight. Quality image and fast focus.

5
Geo 2024-09-04 07:17:43

[1x 1/4"-20 Male] I purchased this for my Canon RF 100-500mm f4.5-f7.1 L IS USM lens because I didn't need or like the bulk or cost of the Kirkland version. At first the fit is a bit loose, but snug up the screw, making sure the shoe is aligned on the foot and it holds nicely.

5
Bradley 0000-00-00 00:00:00

[0.35 lb] My canon 50mm is usm F4 I bought was missing the oem hood and this was a very nice option it fits well and serves my needs, I also got one for my Tamron 150-600mm

5
Tegin 2024-09-09 09:11:38

[Plastic] Fits perfectly on my 50mm 1.2

5
Warren 2024-04-17 02:39:44

[f/16] I have the adapter for the R5 so I could use my other canon lenses. For my first RF lens I decided on the Canon RF 50mm. I am not disappointed. lens is light, fast and a joy. Very sharp when I crop my images to interest area. Was happily surprised. I do a lot of photos around my garden and this is a nice addition. Can't wait to try with my astrophotography when the clouds leave. It doesn't disappoint

5
Rusty 2024-06-03 02:15:21

[2.015 lb] Let's make no mistake this lens is not the Canon RF 85mm f/1.2 but it is still a dam good lens. For me it feels awkward to hold in my hand due to it smoothest of the finish, but that is more on me than a fault of the lens. The quality of the images have exceeded my expectations and highly recommend this lens.

5
John 2024-06-06 05:52:18

[Canon RF] These feel as heavy and sturdy as Canon ETs. I am confident using them with the RF 85mm f/1.2.

5
Kyle 0000-00-00 00:00:00

[62 mm (Front)] I have both the Rokinon 35mm f/1.2 and the 50mm f/1.2 for my Canon M5. Both lenses are rockstars. While they require manual adjustment of the aperture and focus, I actually appreciate that level of engagement when shooting with prime lenses. This lens is usably sharp at f/1.2, much more so than the Canon 50mm f/1.2 (roughly the same focal length when mounted on their respective native cameras). The richness of the colors and contrast is on par with the EF-M 22mm, which is good. This lens also gets top marks for bokeh and build quality. If you're looking to add fast primes to your M kit and know how to shoot on manual with manual focus, this lens will deliver.

5
Ken 2024-04-13 09:25:58

[0.39 lb] I have only taken this out once but the results so far have been beautiful. In context, I've owned the Canon 85mm 1.2 and the Canon 85mm 1.4 back in my dslr days and the Sigma DG DN 85mm 1.4 lens most recently. I shoot a lot of on location portraits and found the 85mm to be too tight on many of the locations I shoot. With that, I reluctantly traded in the Sigma on the Sony 50mm 1.2 lens. I didn't have the funds to keep both. (The Sigma is an amazing lens btw). After shooting the Sony 50mm (another great lens) I found I really missed the compression of the 85mm focal length when I did have the room, so I started looking around for a sleeper and I found it! Im still recovering from the price tag of the Sony 50mm so I was looking for something cheaper than the Sigma to have on hand for those occasions I wanted an 85mm. This Tokina fits the bill perfectly. It is a simple, no bells and whistles piece of glass that takes images comparable to any of the best lenses Ive used. The difference between 1.8 and 1.4 is negligible at best and this is built like a tank with its metal construction. I got it on sale for $399 and is a steal at this price. After shooting this I couldn't justify spending the money on the Sigma again which was one of my all time favorites. It is a very basic lens but the images are awesome even when shot wide open at 1.8.

5