You are using an outdated browser. For a faster, safer browsing experience, upgrade for free today.
Phones: 800
$ USD
  • Your shopping cart is empty!

Dark Core Rgb Pro

Related products

Hyperx Alloy Core Rgb Gaming Keyboard

$149.97 $203.96

Nzxt F240 Rgb Core Fan Unit White

$89.97 $113.36

Nzxt F240 Rgb Core Fan Unit Black

$89.97 $125.96

Nzxt F360 Rgb Core Fan Unit Black

$239.97 $347.96

Nzxt F280 Rgb Core Fan Unit Black

$179.97 $280.75

Nzxt F280 Rgb Core Fan Unit White

$174.39 $226.71

Nzxt F360 Rgb Core Fan Unit White

$216.45 $283.55

Aputure Mc Pro Rgb Led Light Panel

$597.00 $901.47

Kelvin Play Pro Rgb Led Light Panel

$1,047.00 $1,308.75

Gvm Pro Sd300c Rgb Led Monolight 300w

$1,497.00 $2,275.44

Gvm Yu600c Pro Rgb Led Light Panel

$5,097.00 $6,982.89

Ulanzi Vl49 Pro Rgb Led Panel

$89.85 $123.99

Pro Tools Hdx Core Upgrade With Ultimate License

$18,597.00 $25,477.89

Related review

Caleb Molen 0000-00-00 00:00:00

[Rifle] Handles the load of a core i9 14900k. And I love the RGB and general aesthetic of the product.

5
Kerry S. 2024-04-25 09:23:22

[Yes] The HyperX Alloy Core RGB - Gaming Keyboard is all I ever needed and more. It's the best keyboard I've ever had and great looking too.

5
Bleero 0000-00-00 00:00:00

[USB-A ] I could not find a better keyboard that fits my needs. The RGB lightning was a bonus especially in yhe dark. The keyboard is also comfortable to type. I also liked that it has a volume control. I'm very satisfied with my purchase.

5
Rodrigo Schmitt 2024-04-06 02:53:41

[3x 8 GB] Perfect for my Mac Pro (Mid 2010), Quad-core.

5
Kansasdoc 2024-05-01 04:33:35

[1866 MHz DDR3] I decided to replace my 2006 quad core Mac Pro with this machine. It is SOOO quiet. It is quieter than my Macbook Pro. I hooked it to my old 30 cinema display and it is terrific. It is fast and makes work a pleasure. As you know all the hard drives are externally accessed. I decided to keep my old mac pro and attached it to one of the ethernet ports on both. It works very well as a file server. I can run the old mac pro through sharing screens.

5
Jason 2024-05-21 05:15:45

[Percussion] Bought the 6-core Mac Pro for heavy video editing. Already owned a 2012 MBP 13 RETINA, 2011 Mini, 2012 iMac 27, and 2009 Mac Pro. Using the 2009 Mac Pro for capture, and editing on the iMac. The workflow involved with capturing in ProRes 422, then editing, rendering, and compressing was just taking too much time. Not anymore. Like the title says, this beast is everything they promised. Internal read/writes are @ 900MB/s, there are tons of TBv2 ports, enough USB3, and it's sleek & beautiful. Using dual 27 HDMI monitors, watching Netflix, editing video in FCX, importing video from my portable external storage (using a TB to eSATA adapter)...all at the same time...and doing whatever else I feel like, has proven to be, well, not even a strain. I would suggest the 6-core or better for rendering segmented MOV's, since core quantity will still be important in that scenario. Having 6-cores at over 3.5GHz is just honking awesome. Although a second HDMI would've been cool, I find the TB to HDMI dongle to be quite acceptable. It it expensive? Yes, and that is a drawback, but it is a class apart, and actually made in the USA. I don't actually have enough/proper words to describe the coolness of this tech. If you're on the fence...don't be.

5
Oliviero 0000-00-00 00:00:00

[Percussion] Having owned an 8 core Mac Pro since 2008, I had some reservations about the new design. I had visions of endless cables and peripherals that would clutter my precious desk space. With a little thought and reorganization, this hasn't proved to be a problem. For my primary interest, which is photography, the new 6 core Mac Pro is much faster than the old one. It is also much quieter. I chose the 1 TB drive and I added 64 GB of RAM. I also chose the faster clock speed of the 6 core (compared to the slower 8 and 12 core). This makes sense because PhotoShop doesn't use more than 6 cores anyway. The only problem I have run into is obtaining full screen resolution when connecting my NEC PA271W monitor to a Thunderbolt port. Using the Apple Dual DVI to Thunderbolt adaptor, there is a throttling of the signal so that screen resolution cannot exceed 1920x1080. After several hours of talking to Apple technicians and finally to NEC support, I discovered that the only way around this is to use a Display port to Mini-display port cable which enables full resolution to be displayed. Now I have access to the full potential of this elegant and amazingly fast computer.

5
Daniel 2024-04-01 08:20:49

[sWRX8] Using this as the foundation for a video editing rig. Installed a 16 core threadripper pro, 128 of Ram. Bunch of NVME. Lit up on first start and haven't looked back. Runs DaVinci with no worries.

5
Todd 2024-04-16 04:29:55

[Download] I had been looking at the Dinkum System Pro Pack for a couple of years. I was very familiar with the Flexible Conduit used in the core of this system. I was around when this design came out and have seen it used in many places were extreme Flexibility is a must but so is staying put once you get there. I have used it for so many purposes now I know why it was on my wish list for so long. Finding myself in NYC on Fathers Day weekend I got the option to stop a B&H and look for something I really wanted but would never buy myself. Tonight a 7PM game with the field to the do WEST, can you say SUN FLARE! It took 2 mins and that problem was gone. I was able to use the Large Flag, Tube Section and small Spring Clamp, DONE!

5
Macpro_user1979 2024-04-23 04:15:10

[1 TB] I bought this machine 1 month ago , and i have to say as a professional Photographer and Video editor this mac pro is the fastest machine i ever seen i set it up with 32GB of Ram and 4X2TB HD and one 120GB SSD as my boot in the lower optical drive , this mac pro is blazing fast , and it's very quiet, which was not the case with the 2008,2009 mac pro's. This mac pro allows me to export 800 RAW Files (via Adobe Lightroom 3) WITH A resolution of 1920x1080 in 2 min 22 while the newest quad core imac in 56 min ! and the core i7 2.8 Ghz macbook pro in 1 hour 7 min ! I highly recommend this model but not the 12 core because i already try to use most of my mac pro so 8 physical core and the other 8 virtual cores which is 16 cores but my maximum use was 14 cores, so to use 24 cores is impossible so it will be a high waste of money . So better to spend money for RAM and HD and SSD .

5