Nikon F2 As Manual

[2 lb] More facts than you can find in the little Nikon owners manual.

[Aluminum] the lens is very sharp, but it is a manual focus on my Nikon 7200

[Yes] My Nikon Z7II with my 40mm f2 fits very well and there is a little insufficient space for other lenses but it can be useful for some other accessory. I suppose it will also work with larger lenses like the 50 with Z mount. But with an adapter and any other lens the space is insufficient. The quality is good and it is perfect for what I needed, which is to take the camera with me for walks around the city. If I have to carry more objectives, I prefer the backpack.

[APS-C] Back in the 1970's me and my Nikon F2 had a Nikkor reflex. They were an odd duck to use but fun. With the new 400 and 500 f8 reflex lenses by Tokina, and my getting back into film, it made sense to grab one of these inexpensive telephoto's to hook up to my refurbished Nikon F2p. They are lightweight, with manual focus, and an f-stop that requires some fast film. With modern post processing, the loss of contrast is easily fixed. Unusual doughnut shaped Bokeh can be used to your advantage but some folks find the out of focus areas messy. It works very well for night time shots when mounted to an astronomical guided tripod.

[Sony E] Works like advertised. I use it with the Nikon Nikkor AI 35mm F2 (Nikon F Mount Ai) for a Sony a6500; fits tight, focus ♾. Great buy.

[8] I shoot film for two reasons: 1. Film lets me shoot with old cameras. (My favorites right now are the Nikon F2 and Nikon S2. I also shoot a Nikon FE which I like very much.) Older cameras don't necessarily take "better" pictures, but I think I take better pictures with them. I have to slow down and be more deliberate. This doesn't mean I can't shoot something that is happening at high-tempo, but I just have to plan better. 2. Film renders images differently than one of my digital cameras. Colors, contrasts, dynamic range -- all different. Not necessarily "better," but different. Better is a matter of opinion based on whatever criteria you establish. Sometimes "better" is not technically superior; it just looks really nice. So, this review is following my first roll of Lomo100. I was shooting my F2 with a 50mm f/2. Lomo100 has a nice clean look about it. Contrast is pretty good in strong outdoor light where you'll probably be using 100 speed film anyway. Colors are not super-saturated, but nice. It renders color somewhere between Portra and Ektar. It's a tad bit grainy for a 100 speed film -- but see note 2 above -- NBD. It's inexpensive and fun to shoot. Although I shoot more expensive films on occasion, I have a hard time justifying it in a 35mm camera when you can have a great time with stuff like this, Fuji C200, and Agfa 200 (if you can still find some).

[Camera] Been using Nikon (cable) remote triggers since at least the F2. and the WR 10 WR T10 on the last four digital cams. Has great range and never fails. Figured it was time to pony up for WR 11A WR T10 for peace of mind as I depend on it. The hinge on new receiver is great as it tucks in sideways for the Z9 and doesn't look like an afterthought.

[52 mm (Front)] Perfect size and weight on both my Fuji X-T4 (w/ adapter) and my old Nikon F2. Color rendering and sharpness are top-notch. It's just a marvelous all-purpose lens that I've used on everything from portraits to a news assignment.

[Aluminum] This lens hood fits the 23 mm f2 and the 35 mm F2 lens very nicely Works as stated and looks amazing

[2 x 40Gb QSFP+] Well made, using with Wimberly f2 arms.