Sennheiser Px 200 Iii Headphones

[6 x 5 x 0.2"] Returned the Sennheiser HD 200 Pro Monitoring Headphones in exchange for this Tascam and the build quality is decent for the price. Great dynamic range for this price as well and bigger driver

[5.25 x 4 x 0.1"] This would be the Illmatic of Headphones for DJs. Sennheiser kept If it ain't broke, don't try fix it. Many user replaceable parts. Light weights construction for hours of use without fatigue. I believe 2024 marks the 35 years anniversary of this headphones. As glasses wearer, on-ear nature of this headphones works wonder. Since nothing existed in this world is perfect, here are few cons; little thin and easy to get tangled straight cable, coiled cable is also nice to have but little to heavy and long for my taste. Although included Pleather pads are comfy, and gets worn out rather quick. Invest in velour pads like ones from DT770.

[0.7 lb] It makes my casio px keyboard work. That's what I bought it for.

[Closed-Back] Guess who's back to buy their second pairs of marshall Major III Bluetooth On ear headphones, I AM!!! I got my first pair of marshall wireless headphones when I turned 14 (I turned 17 today), and those things lasted me up until 4 days ago when I dropped them down the stairs..Oopsie.. I'm talking about wearing them up to 12 hours everyday, to the gym, to school, while traveling, and so on for three years straight!!! I even use to play ball toss with my friends using the headphones as the ball, and they somehow managed to survive each fall!! While I don't recommend playing catch with them I will say I recommend the Major III Headphones !!!!! Those babies where my confidence boosters on the way to class each day, blasting the bass on max volume!!! I'm currently saving up money for my next pair, because believe me, The price was worth it!!! - Sophia. S

[52 mm (Drop-In)] I am writing this review for both he 400mm f/2.8 IS III & 600mm f/4.0 IS III. I had the opportunity to test the 400mm, 600mm, 500mm f/4.0 II, 200-400mm f/4.0, and had my own 300mm f/2.8 IS II. These are the things that deserve highlighting: (1) Weight: The 400 and 600 are lighter than any of the lenses. The 200-400 is by far the heaviest. (2) Balance: Both the 400 and 600 have the best center balance. (3) Focus: The 400 and 600 provided the fastest auto focus. (4) Image Quality: This is hard to explain unless you place the images side by side with the 400 or 600. The 400 and 600 performed miraculously, even in low lighting for a sport venue. I had no intention, nor was I looking to purchase a new lens. Up to this point, my plan was to wait for Canon to release an updated 200-400mm zoom. I've used the 200-400mm lens in the past and absolutely loved it, but some of the sporting venues experienced low lighting once the sunset and the 200-400mm did not perform well. Now, I'm in a dilemma. I've been saving money for the new Mac Pro (and monitor) due later this year and I cannot stop thinking about the 400 and 600. As a side note, I installed the Canon 1.4x III extender on the 400mm and found the results came out just as clear.  My recommendation, go see one for yourself and if you have a version II, bring it with you so you can see and feel the difference.

[4] Right size for Canon gear I use: 1DX Mark III; 70-200, 24-70, 16-35 L lenses; 600EX-II-RT flash in padded case, 12 backup battery pack, reporter's notebook. Compact, heavy, swinging across shoulder nearer my center of gravity. Called B&H Jan. 16, unboxed it in Grand Rapids, MI 2 days later, stuffed above toys in bag thinking it might loosen openings for my next night's. Worked. Liked the sand option also.

[1.4x] The Nikon 1.4 TC III is excellent. I really appreciate the extra range when using my Nikon 200-500 5.6 for wildlife photography. Optical quality is superb. The only disappointment is that the AF is noticeably slower when using the TC.

[Multi Coated] I am writing this review for both he 400mm f/2.8 IS III & 600mm f/4.0 IS III. I had the opportunity to test the 400mm, 600mm, 500mm f/4.0 II, 200-400mm f/4.0, and had my own 300mm f/2.8 IS II. These are the things that deserve highlighting: (1) Weight: The 400 and 600 are lighter than any of the lenses. The 200-400 is by far the heaviest. (2) Balance: Both the 400 and 600 have the best center balance. (3) Focus: The 400 and 600 provided the fastest auto focus. (4) Image Quality: This is hard to explain unless you place the images side by side with the 400 or 600. The 400 and 600 performed miraculously, even in low lighting for a sport venue. I had no intention, nor was I looking to purchase a new lens. Up to this point, my plan was to wait for Canon to release an updated 200-400mm zoom. I've used the 200-400mm lens in the past and absolutely loved it, but some of the sporting venues experienced low lighting once the sunset and the 200-400mm did not perform well. Now, I'm in a dilemma. I've been saving money for the new Mac Pro (and monitor) due later this year and I cannot stop thinking about the 400 and 600. As a side note, I installed the Canon 1.4x III extender on the 400mm and found the results came out just as clear. My recommendation, go see one for yourself and if you have a version II, bring it with you so you can see and feel the difference.

[Handle] I have my 5d mark iii, 30d, four L lenses (including a 70-200 f/2.8), three 580ex-ii flashes and battery packs, an H4N audio recorder and mic in this case with plenty of room for 1-2 more lenses. Even with all of that, it's not terribly heavy, though I will be getting some sort of wheels for it. It's four clasps are super easy to open and close, and they are very secure. I am confident that my equipment is safe from any/all transportation required.

[32 W (Typical)] Sennheiser never disappoints! Been a Dj for over 20 years and these are the best headphones I've owned!!!