You are using an outdated browser. For a faster, safer browsing experience, upgrade for free today.
Phones: 800
$ USD
  • Your shopping cart is empty!

Sony 70 200 F4 Ii

Related products

Canon Rf 70-200mm F4 Is Lens Cover - White

$281.25 $390.94

Canon Rf 70-200mm F4 Is Lens Cover - Black

$281.25 $447.19

Related review

MC 2024-04-17 07:57:56

[Latch] Fits great for kit: Sony A7R IV w/ Sony 70-200 f4 g II attached (fits without removing divider) Sony 16-35 GM I Sigma 24-70 DG DN Art Have two leftover storage spots for batteries, filters, hoods FWIW, fits well in backseat and slides partially under my seat so great for me personally on road trips with the dog etc I had a similar valve system as the Pelicans. Everything is precut I cannot stress enough how perfect the A7R iv and 70-200 f4 II fit in the large compartment. That lens was often the first I left at home just because it’s slightly smaller size made it too big/small for my various bags and cases

5
Kevin 2024-04-01 03:15:30

[2.46 oz (70 g)] Just what i was looking for. This plate fit my sony 70-200 F4 perfect. I do recommend this product, made well. Thanks Sunwayfoto.

5
anyonymous 2024-04-15 02:50:15

[1/4"-20 Female] I just used it for the first time yesterday. I put my Canon 70-200 f4 with IS on a Sony a7s ii. It worked perfectly. I was able to increase the speed to 2.8, and the IS worked just fine. It looks to be built well, and works exactly as I'd hoped. I'll update this review if my opinion changes.

5
Ji Qiang 2024-04-13 01:51:23

[Neoprene rubber] I had a Sony 70-200 f4, which works well for general tourism photos, but fell short for wildlife. I bout this lens with X2converter.it works great

5
Sepp 2024-09-12 04:37:30

[Plastic] I was waiting forever for the Sony 70-200mm F4 to come down another hundred dollars, considering that the price for the same lens in the Canon edition is less than $900. The other lens I had my eye on for my Sony a 7 III was the Zeiss Batis 135 F 2.8. The 70-200 would bring me closer to wild life (I live in the country and don't have the money for a 200-600mm lens), the Batis 135 would gather more light for indoor dance and band photos. The Batis price came down first and I so bought it, not sure whether it was a wise move. I have used it now for two weeks, mostly to photograph late-in-the-day and under-the-lights soccer games, and while the telephoto reach is marginal for such events, the images are tack-sharp and color popping at 1/800, F 4, and ISO 1000. A sweet lens, and actually smaller and lighter than my Sony FE2.8/90 Macro G OSS, also a great lens. I will keep this Batis.

5
TSE JEN 2024-04-14 08:51:20

[3 oz (85 g)] It works with my new Sony 70-200 f2.8 GM OSS II perfectly!!

5
Gregory 2024-05-12 09:25:30

[1/4"-20] I use this on my Nikon 70/200 F4. Fits snugly and securely.

5
Wenhui 2024-05-03 01:24:43

[Zipper] Good for my a7cr/16-35 GM/ 70-200 F4/ 35GM.

5
Bonyo 2024-07-06 02:36:34

[0.155 lb] Works as described. Using it with Leica M and 70-200 2.8 II IS lens

5
Kyle L 2024-04-02 04:38:30

[Dark Brown] Bought this to carry and protect my new (at the time) 70-200 F4 L. This case does a great job, plenty of space for the lens with the hood reversed. The fact that it colapses flat when not in use is a major bonus, one less fat bag hanging off my shoulder. Construction is high quality and it comes with a pull-over rain protector. The only potential downside is the collapsability means it may be more lightly padded than some other lens pouches, especially on the sides.

5