Sony E 35Mm F1 8

[13" / 33 cm] This is the most realistic F1 wheel out there.

[Sony E] The lens gives you the same type of look as the Sony 35mm. This is a reliable brand!

[Bowens S] First, 60W will probably meet your needs in a small video studio. I only use 2-8% of the output. Secondly, a standard modifier platform (Bowens' S mount), has saved me a great deal of time. The lower cost silent heads would only accept barndoors, gaffing tape and aluminum foil. Far Far easier to repurpose old modifiers or purchase new. Previously, I would have to retape the foil at inopportune times. SILENCE is critical for me. Recording a cast once correctly is worth all the post processing in the world. Nothing beats SILENCE.

[0.665 lb] Works well with my 16-35mm Sony zoom. I just wish they made a similar adapter in 77mm.

[5.4 x 3 x 1"] Works as intended. Batteries are securely held. 8x AA, 4x AAA, 1x 9v.

If you are F1 fan and like playing F1 2011, this is the the wheel to have.

[8.5 lb] If you are F1 fan and like playing F1 2011, this is the the wheel to have.

[Nikon Z] I own the 65mm f/2 APO and 35mm f/2 APO paired with sony a7rIII. Mostly shot in the harsh desert sun, with some magic golden hours. The lens is really sharp (when you nail the focus). I end up stitching a lot of panaramo photos to make landscape photo with both lens and have enjoyed the end results. My only negative is the 35mm has a funky looking lens flare, when I shoot into the sun at the right angle with a higher f-stop. I can get green honeycomb flare that looks... meh... But amazing lens, don't really take off my camera unless its for the 65mm. I had the lens hood on, decided I dont like it. I prefer the smaller profile

[0.28 lb] you must have it if you want to carry your Zoom F1 recorder comfortably and safely

[f/2] I've always liked the 35mm focal length, and when I bought my Sony camera, I researched all available 35mm lenses. I read available reviews and it came down between the Sigma and the the Sony 35mm GM f1.4. I tried the Sony, but, though reviewers say it is light and small for what it is, it was simply too big (long). Also, I do not need f1.4. The Sigma is not all that different from the Sony in the way the two lenses render, and differences in sharpness are small enough for me. Given the price of the two lenses, my decision was easy to make. I looked at the Sony f1.8, the Sony f2.8, the Samyang 2.8 and 1.8, but I find a lens without an aperture ring not as inspiring. This Sigma is sharp enough and has a pleasant rendering, and the price is right. I like it! This is one of the reviews for the lens I relied on, before buying it: https://www.fredmiranda.com/forum/topic/1686080/0